The Putin theory is not much better, it do not think he would do something so obvious. And I really can't see the relation between Buchanan views on isolationism and is comment.
The relation between Lietvienko's murder and Putin is kinda not that hard to find; Anna Politkovskaya, she did researches and talked loud enough to cause some considerable damage to Putin's image, alexander litvinenko was on some serious trails to find Pokitkovskaya's murderers and as an ex-KGB agent, it would fair to assume that his contacts have something to to with peoples within the Kremlin or the new FSB. Pat Buchanan totally put away this VERY important part of the puzzle. IF you recall the facts: Politkovskaya was doing some new inquiries about Chechnya, the kind that Putin was finding very disturbing.... she got murdered.... An ex-KGB agent fiercely known for his anti-Putin's stark point of view was on the trail to find some very important informations about Anna's death and all of a sudden, he got murdered; It's killing 3 birds with a stone) 1) you get rid of the annoying journalist who was sneaking where she shouldn't 2) you kill the man who was perhaps the closest to find who was responsible for it 3) you throw a loud message to all the other spies that would be tempted to do the same.
Now why using Polium you ask me as, for example, a fair dose of arsenic or cyanide? The answer is plain simple: for the symbol; a death via something radioactive, inspiring all the side effects and the terror of nuclear threat will always hammer someone's imagination more than just being killed by some mere miscellaneous poison concocted by Mr Hyde in his lab. Second, if you put yourself in an isolationism theory like this good dear ol' Oat, this would suggest to curb yourself over your problems and to not take care of what's going on outside, which is exactly the situation here: an ex-secret agent who's out of the country and who has now a new citizenship. In an isolationism logic, that would be the only thing to do.
Now, how the death of Alexander could do any harm to Putin? Nobody has no proofs against him, the Kremlin will deny it, Scotland Yard are most likely to find nothing as the agent(s) who did it were probably out of the country one hour after the poisoning. Also,country like the U.S won't move a nail as they need Russia for the Iranian and North Korean issues.... No proofs, No guilt and as Guy Debord said, make the thing so big, to evident that nobody will believe that it's you.
I highly doubt it... especially when we know the views of Buchanan over America and how it should self-close on itself.
Posted by
nameless |
5:20 p.m.
The Putin theory is not much better, it do not think he would do something so obvious. And I really can't see the relation between Buchanan views on isolationism and is comment.
Posted by
Max |
7:39 p.m.
The relation between Lietvienko's murder and Putin is kinda not that hard to find; Anna Politkovskaya, she did researches and talked loud enough to cause some considerable damage to Putin's image, alexander litvinenko was on some serious trails to find Pokitkovskaya's murderers and as an ex-KGB agent, it would fair to assume that his contacts have something to to with peoples within the Kremlin or the new FSB. Pat Buchanan totally put away this VERY important part of the puzzle. IF you recall the facts: Politkovskaya was doing some new inquiries about Chechnya, the kind that Putin was finding very disturbing.... she got murdered.... An ex-KGB agent fiercely known for his anti-Putin's stark point of view was on the trail to find some very important informations about Anna's death and all of a sudden, he got murdered; It's killing 3 birds with a stone)
1) you get rid of the annoying journalist who was sneaking where she shouldn't
2) you kill the man who was perhaps the closest to find who was responsible for it
3) you throw a loud message to all the other spies that would be tempted to do the same.
Now why using Polium you ask me as, for example, a fair dose of arsenic or cyanide? The answer is plain simple: for the symbol; a death via something radioactive, inspiring all the side effects and the terror of nuclear threat will always hammer someone's imagination more than just being killed by some mere miscellaneous poison concocted by Mr Hyde in his lab.
Second, if you put yourself in an isolationism theory like this good dear ol' Oat, this would suggest to curb yourself over your problems and to not take care of what's going on outside, which is exactly the situation here: an ex-secret agent who's out of the country and who has now a new citizenship. In an isolationism logic, that would be the only thing to do.
Now, how the death of Alexander could do any harm to Putin? Nobody has no proofs against him, the Kremlin will deny it, Scotland Yard are most likely to find nothing as the agent(s) who did it were probably out of the country one hour after the poisoning. Also,country like the U.S won't move a nail as they need Russia for the Iranian and North Korean issues.... No proofs, No guilt and as Guy Debord said, make the thing so big, to evident that nobody will believe that it's you.
Posted by
nameless |
7:57 a.m.